Farm Subsidy information
Mitchell County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Mitchell County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 960
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Mitchell County, North Carolina totaled $4,312,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Kenneth R Woody | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $13,317 |
62 | Charles Griffith | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $13,070 |
63 | Bill Buchanan | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $12,932 |
64 | Charles Canipe | Spruce Pine, NC 28777 | $12,703 |
65 | Paul D Dover | Spruce Pine, NC 28777 | $12,602 |
66 | Donald Frye | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $12,333 |
67 | Bobby Ray Yelton | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $12,079 |
68 | Elaine Miller | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $11,840 |
69 | Salve D Mckinney Jr | Little Switzerland, NC 28749 | $11,822 |
70 | Van Peterson | Green Mountain, NC 28740 | $11,584 |
71 | Loy Street | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $11,487 |
72 | Gary Hyatt | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $10,996 |
73 | Phillip R Pate | Green Mountain, NC 28740 | $10,967 |
74 | Douglas Harrell | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $10,944 |
75 | Ben Mosley Jr | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $10,221 |
76 | Rick Miller | Green Mountain, NC 28740 | $10,116 |
77 | Jones E Hughes | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $10,041 |
78 | Donald Miller | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $10,007 |
79 | Lanny Wright | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $9,784 |
80 | Steve Wilson | Bakersville, NC 28705 | $9,550 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”