Farm Subsidy information
Orange County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Orange County, North Carolina, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 88
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Orange County, North Carolina totaled $1,154,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mark Miller | Rougemont, NC 27572 | $7,337 |
22 | Kirk Farms & Landscaping Inc. | Hillsborough, NC 27278 | $7,178 |
23 | Wolfgang Lotz | Cedar Grove, NC 27231 | $6,720 |
24 | Sykes Dairy Inc | Mebane, NC 27302 | $6,496 |
25 | David K Walker | Hillsborough, NC 27278 | $4,918 |
26 | Teer Farms Inc | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $3,989 |
27 | 2 F Farms | Salisbury, NC 28145 | $3,958 |
28 | David C Pope | Cedar Grove, NC 27231 | $3,837 |
29 | Donald Pope | Cedar Grove, NC 27231 | $3,830 |
30 | Randy Pope | Cedar Grove, NC 27231 | $3,334 |
31 | Gaston Y Pierce | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $3,251 |
32 | Stephen P Finley | Cedar Grove, NC 27231 | $3,161 |
33 | Earnest Thomas Gentry Jr | Mebane, NC 27302 | $2,759 |
34 | William Keith Trollinger | Hillsborough, NC 27278 | $2,224 |
35 | Murray C Lynch | Mebane, NC 27302 | $2,070 |
36 | Carlton Parker | Hurdle Mills, NC 27541 | $2,022 |
37 | Charles Kelly Allred | Mebane, NC 27302 | $1,876 |
38 | William D Berry Jr | Hurdle Mills, NC 27541 | $1,846 |
39 | Vernon P Davis | Chapel Hill, NC 27516 | $1,839 |
40 | Mary Sue W Johnson | Hillsborough, NC 27278 | $1,668 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”