Deficiency Payment in Pasquotank County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 134
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Pasquotank County, North Carolina totaled $396,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | L E Ballance | Norfolk, VA 23509 | $416 |
82 | Sophia Ashburn | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $412 |
83 | Murphy Sample | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $389 |
84 | Mary W Harris | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $366 |
85 | Evelyn J Matthews | Southern Shores, NC 27949 | $352 |
86 | Edna S James | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $338 |
87 | Sherbert E Meads | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $333 |
88 | James Brothers | Sunbury, NC 27979 | $331 |
89 | Calvin Hudson | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $278 |
90 | J W Jones Lumber Co Inc | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $269 |
91 | Kevin B Weeks | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $239 |
92 | Edna Brothers | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $237 |
93 | Linwood Carver | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $236 |
94 | Carlton Dozier | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $209 |
95 | Lisa Winslow | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $136 |
96 | Bessie Godfrey | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $113 |
97 | Harold W Lewis | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $102 |
98 | Herbert Bruce Morgan Jr | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $76 |
99 | Michael L Morgan Estate | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $76 |
100 | Sarah L B Madre | Elizabeth City, NC 27909 | $8 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”