Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Pitt County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 209
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Pitt County, North Carolina totaled $921,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Steven Wayne Stancill | Greenville, NC 27834 | $7,882 |
42 | Robert Bruce Moore | Grifton, NC 28530 | $7,879 |
43 | Agribusiness Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $7,362 |
44 | Barnhill Farms Of North Carolina | Stokes, NC 27884 | $7,149 |
45 | Carl Sidney Scott | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $7,006 |
46 | L A Moye Farms | Maury, NC 28554 | $6,926 |
47 | James & James Farms Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $6,871 |
48 | Kenneth Randal Hedgepeth | Fountain, NC 27829 | $6,706 |
49 | Ronnie Moore | Fountain, NC 27829 | $6,639 |
50 | William Douglas Peaden Estate | Farmville, NC 27828 | $6,468 |
51 | Bobby Ray Smith | Greenville, NC 27858 | $6,380 |
52 | Douglas Ray Farmer | Stokes, NC 27884 | $6,342 |
53 | Nancy M Everette | Greenville, NC 27834 | $6,302 |
54 | Sammy Everette | Greenville, NC 27834 | $6,302 |
55 | Corey Farms Inc | Greenville, NC 27858 | $6,297 |
56 | E Crowell Pope Jr | Washington, NC 27889 | $6,209 |
57 | Bruce Farmer Jr | Stokes, NC 27884 | $6,156 |
58 | Douglas Ray Farmer Jr | Stokes, NC 27884 | $6,156 |
59 | Thomas R Beamon | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $6,140 |
60 | Kenneth Manning Jr | Bethel, NC 27812 | $6,078 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”