Cotton Transistion Assistance Program in Pitt County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 209
Recipients of Cotton Transistion Assistance Program from farms in Pitt County, North Carolina totaled $921,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Transistion Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Dixon Family Farms Inc | Grimesland, NC 27837 | $3,327 |
82 | Brock Farms Inc | Winterville, NC 28590 | $3,305 |
83 | Big W Farms Inc | Maury, NC 28554 | $3,228 |
84 | Adam B Beaman | Winterville, NC 28590 | $3,197 |
85 | David Allen Heath | Dover, NC 28526 | $3,053 |
86 | Jason T Beamon | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $3,045 |
87 | Whitehurst Farms Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $2,908 |
88 | Corey And Sons Farms | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $2,840 |
89 | William Stanley Cherry Jr | Greenville, NC 27858 | $2,834 |
90 | James Caleb Cannon | Grifton, NC 28530 | $2,815 |
91 | Dennis Ray Wood | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $2,764 |
92 | Abm Partnership | Greenville, NC 27834 | $2,612 |
93 | Eric Briley Farms Inc | Greenville, NC 27834 | $2,589 |
94 | Michael H Keel | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $2,507 |
95 | David Eugene Rogister | Bethel, NC 27812 | $2,418 |
96 | E Wayne Buck | Ayden, NC 28513 | $2,365 |
97 | Johnny & Jimmy Lewis Partnership | Farmville, NC 27828 | $2,125 |
98 | Timothy C Wood | Hookerton, NC 28538 | $2,085 |
99 | Donald Earl Lee | Greenville, NC 27834 | $2,049 |
100 | Noel Lee III | Washington, NC 27889 | $2,035 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”