Total Commodity Programs in Pitt County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 292
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pitt County, North Carolina totaled $4,703,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Joseph Brent Pilgreen | Bath, NC 27808 | $17,156 |
82 | J-1 Enterprises Inc | Vanceboro, NC 28586 | $17,137 |
83 | William Tyler Dunn | Grifton, NC 28530 | $15,976 |
84 | Agribusiness Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $15,960 |
85 | Humbles Enterprises LLC | Ayden, NC 28513 | $15,399 |
86 | Dixon Family Farms Inc | Grimesland, NC 27837 | $15,330 |
87 | Gay Farms Inc | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $15,066 |
88 | David E Whitehurst Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $14,822 |
89 | Larry G Whitehurst Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $14,822 |
90 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $14,496 |
91 | Agcarolina Farm Credit ** | Elizabeth City, NC 27906 | $14,163 |
92 | Eastern Agribusiness LLC | Snow Hill, NC 28580 | $14,120 |
93 | Steven Wayne Stancill | Greenville, NC 27834 | $13,860 |
94 | The Cannon Corporation | Ayden, NC 28513 | $13,605 |
95 | Charles Thomas Mclawhorn Jr | Greenville, NC 27834 | $13,322 |
96 | Edward E Dail Farms | Conetoe, NC 27819 | $12,656 |
97 | Richard Channing Armstrong | Grimesland, NC 27837 | $12,338 |
98 | Gregory W Allen | Winterville, NC 28590 | $11,841 |
99 | H D & L Enterprises Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $11,217 |
100 | William Tyler Dunn | Grifton, NC 28530 | $11,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”