Farm Subsidy information
Pitt County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Pitt County, North Carolina, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 327
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Pitt County, North Carolina totaled $17,942,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Worthington Farms Inc | Greenville, NC 27834 | $633,994 |
2 | Jack Allen Farms | Winterville, NC 28590 | $534,874 |
3 | Stancill Farms Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $374,775 |
4 | Charles E Tucker | Tarboro, NC 27886 | $368,808 |
5 | Congleton Farms Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $320,097 |
6 | J P Davenport & Son Inc | Greenville, NC 27834 | $311,358 |
7 | Whitehurst Farms Ptns | Conetoe, NC 27819 | $308,534 |
8 | Tar River Grain LLC | Greenville, NC 27834 | $298,740 |
9 | Ec Pope Farms LLC | Washington, NC 27889 | $281,881 |
10 | Roland Lee Sanderson Jr | Grifton, NC 28530 | $255,096 |
11 | W C Moore | Bethel, NC 27812 | $250,157 |
12 | L Tyson & Sons Inc | Ayden, NC 28513 | $237,250 |
13 | S & S Farms Ptr | Farmville, NC 27828 | $221,986 |
14 | D Howard Nanney Jr | Farmville, NC 27828 | $210,245 |
15 | Flat Swamp Farms Inc | Robersonville, NC 27871 | $199,756 |
16 | Douglas Ray Farmer Jr | Stokes, NC 27884 | $196,381 |
17 | Bruce Farmer Jr | Stokes, NC 27884 | $195,716 |
18 | Whitehurst Farms Inc | Stokes, NC 27884 | $194,256 |
19 | Rbm Farms LLC | Grifton, NC 28530 | $191,400 |
20 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $187,112 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>