Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Rowan County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 191
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Rowan County, North Carolina totaled $3,952,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James Todd Mauldin | China Grove, NC 28023 | $35,645 |
22 | Kim Starnes | Salisbury, NC 28146 | $34,417 |
23 | Michael L Owen | Salisbury, NC 28147 | $34,017 |
24 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $34,017 |
25 | Edwin H Hammill | Gold Hill, NC 28071 | $30,498 |
26 | Mark R Hammill | Gold Hill, NC 28071 | $30,478 |
27 | Happy Hill Farm Inc | Mooresville, NC 28115 | $28,923 |
28 | Chris A Hoffner | Mount Ulla, NC 28125 | $27,569 |
29 | Back Creek Angus LLC | Mount Ulla, NC 28125 | $20,693 |
30 | Mark T Tevepaugh | Davidson, NC 28036 | $19,918 |
31 | W Eric Pence | Cleveland, NC 27013 | $19,557 |
32 | Braxton R Barger | Salisbury, NC 28147 | $19,377 |
33 | Correll Farms LLC | Cleveland, NC 27013 | $19,345 |
34 | Hiatt Diamond H LLC | Mount Ulla, NC 28125 | $18,040 |
35 | Timothy P Shue | Rockwell, NC 28138 | $17,692 |
36 | Fred H Snyder | Cleveland, NC 27013 | $17,296 |
37 | Chad M Yates | Rockwell, NC 28138 | $17,063 |
38 | Hamby Farm Inc | Salisbury, NC 28147 | $16,055 |
39 | Richard E Deal | China Grove, NC 28023 | $15,503 |
40 | Robert L Miller | China Grove, NC 28023 | $15,201 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”