Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Rutherford County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 127
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Rutherford County, North Carolina totaled $606,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Spencer Weeks | Rutherfordton, NC 28139 | $4,298 |
42 | Jeff H Lawson | Ellenboro, NC 28040 | $4,290 |
43 | Anthony Dowdle | Union Mills, NC 28167 | $4,233 |
44 | Jody Jenkins | Ellenboro, NC 28040 | $4,222 |
45 | William M Mccurry | Union Mills, NC 28167 | $4,072 |
46 | William J Elliott Jr | Rutherfordton, NC 28139 | $3,877 |
47 | Donald Harold Murray Jr | Bostic, NC 28018 | $3,683 |
48 | Jeffrey Bradley | Pisgah Forest, NC 28768 | $3,521 |
49 | Tjr Ltd | Forest City, NC 28043 | $3,481 |
50 | James Perry Harris | Mooresboro, NC 28114 | $3,453 |
51 | William Clinton Green | Bostic, NC 28018 | $3,365 |
52 | Raymond Nelson Mccurry | Bostic, NC 28018 | $3,343 |
53 | Earl Wells | Union Mills, NC 28167 | $3,252 |
54 | George W Harrill | Forest City, NC 28043 | $3,228 |
55 | Sonya M Stott | Rutherfordton, NC 28139 | $3,221 |
56 | Alvin Ray Dedmon | Forest City, NC 28043 | $3,198 |
57 | Patrice L Mintz | Rutherfordton, NC 28139 | $3,163 |
58 | Olin W Freeman | Bostic, NC 28018 | $3,160 |
59 | Roger Moore | Union Mills, NC 28167 | $3,123 |
60 | J Andrew Moss | Forest City, NC 28043 | $3,030 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”