Farm Subsidy information
Rutherford County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Rutherford County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 790
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Rutherford County, North Carolina totaled $11,761,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Andrew W Roberson | Forest City, NC 28043 | $13,121 |
162 | Margaret J Parker | Rutherfordton, NC 28139 | $13,055 |
163 | Douglas H Nethaway | Bostic, NC 28018 | $12,977 |
164 | Thomas E Carswell | Bostic, NC 28018 | $12,967 |
165 | William M Mccurry | Union Mills, NC 28167 | $12,927 |
166 | T C Holland | Forest City, NC 28043 | $12,736 |
167 | Diane C Fountain | Union Mills, NC 28167 | $12,533 |
168 | Anthony Dowdle | Union Mills, NC 28167 | $12,424 |
169 | Hubert L Jenkins | Chesnee, SC 29323 | $12,306 |
170 | Melton Living Trust | Brandon, MS 39047 | $12,302 |
171 | Joel Lambert | Union Mills, NC 28167 | $12,283 |
172 | Nancy Littlejohn | Forest City, NC 28043 | $12,148 |
173 | Jerry Wayne Shields | Columbus, NC 28722 | $12,071 |
174 | Jimmy Walter Gettys | Shelby, NC 28150 | $11,990 |
175 | Danny Ledford | Mooresboro, NC 28114 | $11,985 |
176 | James T Camper | Rutherfordton, NC 28139 | $11,971 |
177 | Marion Gettys | Shelby, NC 28150 | $11,893 |
178 | Darlene Lawson | Ellenboro, NC 28040 | $11,882 |
179 | Thomas Marvin Wallace | Raleigh, NC 27606 | $11,881 |
180 | James W Doggett Jr | Henrietta, NC 28076 | $11,643 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”