Farm Subsidy information
Sampson County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Sampson County, North Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 419
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Sampson County, North Carolina totaled $31,314,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Michael Dwayne Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $237,681 |
22 | Joseph A Warren III | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $236,831 |
23 | Bobcat Farms LLC | Clinton, NC 28329 | $236,688 |
24 | Dl&b Enterprises Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $227,500 |
25 | G & R Farms Partnership | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $227,015 |
26 | William Rodney Jackson | Autryville, NC 28318 | $225,124 |
27 | P & J Farming Inc | Warsaw, NC 28398 | $224,773 |
28 | Triple M Incorporated | Clinton, NC 28328 | $211,716 |
29 | Herbert Wayne Cannady II | Harrells, NC 28444 | $204,615 |
30 | K & C Farms Of North Carolina | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $203,155 |
31 | Danny Joe Pope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $199,366 |
32 | Rye Swamp Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $179,937 |
33 | Terry S Bass | Dunn, NC 28334 | $170,980 |
34 | Arthur Cale Lee | Dunn, NC 28334 | $169,631 |
35 | I & J Blueberry Farm | Atkinson, NC 28421 | $161,738 |
36 | Hope Farming Company Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $153,338 |
37 | Elliott L Bass | Dunn, NC 28334 | $149,491 |
38 | William J Hering Jr | Faison, NC 28341 | $142,133 |
39 | Augustine Farm Inc | Hammonton, NJ 08037 | $141,118 |
40 | Royal Farming | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $130,839 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”