Total Emergency Relief Program in Sampson County, North Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 208
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Sampson County, North Carolina totaled $15,038,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Moore Outdoor Ventures Incorporated | Turkey, NC 28393 | $219,750 |
22 | Joseph A Warren III | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $210,469 |
23 | Herbert Wayne Cannady II | Harrells, NC 28444 | $204,615 |
24 | K & C Farms Of North Carolina | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $202,005 |
25 | William Rodney Jackson | Autryville, NC 28318 | $196,215 |
26 | Danny Joe Pope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $196,148 |
27 | Rye Swamp Farms | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $178,565 |
28 | Terry S Bass | Dunn, NC 28334 | $170,980 |
29 | Arthur Cale Lee | Dunn, NC 28334 | $164,167 |
30 | I & J Blueberry Farm | Atkinson, NC 28421 | $161,738 |
31 | Hope Farming Company Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $152,182 |
32 | Elliott L Bass | Dunn, NC 28334 | $148,953 |
33 | Malcolm Ray Wilson | Clinton, NC 28328 | $146,456 |
34 | Augustine Farm Inc | Hammonton, NJ 08037 | $141,118 |
35 | Elizabeth H Johnson | Clinton, NC 28328 | $125,000 |
36 | Royal Farming | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $122,574 |
37 | William J Hering Jr | Faison, NC 28341 | $119,147 |
38 | Cms Farming Co Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $105,731 |
39 | Carr Farms | Clinton, NC 28328 | $101,670 |
40 | Little Man Farming Inc | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $101,053 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”