Total Commodity Programs in Sampson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 7,043
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sampson County, North Carolina totaled $211,597,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ten Mile Farm Inc | Faison, NC 28341 | $1,024,630 |
42 | Henry P Lucas Jr | Turkey, NC 28393 | $1,020,693 |
43 | Hope Farming Company Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $1,018,983 |
44 | Lucas Farms | Turkey, NC 28393 | $963,689 |
45 | Michael L Godwin Farms Inc | Dunn, NC 28334 | $933,783 |
46 | West Farm & Livestock Inc | Dunn, NC 28334 | $929,437 |
47 | David G Godwin Farms Inc | Dunn, NC 28334 | $926,498 |
48 | Shw Sow Farm LLC | Smithfield, NC 27577 | $923,218 |
49 | Luther Wilson Inc | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $915,795 |
50 | James L Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $889,434 |
51 | James Hurbie Faircloth Partnership F & W Farm | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $884,783 |
52 | Andy Pope Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $884,078 |
53 | J Michael Hope | Clinton, NC 28328 | $884,037 |
54 | A T Lee & Sons Inc | Dunn, NC 28334 | $881,605 |
55 | Jackson's Farming Co | Autryville, NC 28318 | $872,869 |
56 | Robert Naylor Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $866,376 |
57 | Mclamb Farm | Clinton, NC 28328 | $856,055 |
58 | Mark H Bass | Faison, NC 28341 | $848,091 |
59 | R S S Farms Inc | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $844,139 |
60 | Hobbs & Peterson Farms | Clinton, NC 28328 | $831,022 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”