Total Disaster Programs in Sampson County, North Carolina, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 122
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Sampson County, North Carolina totaled $4,624,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Terrell Williams | Autryville, NC 28318 | $6,074 |
82 | George K Eakins Jr | Surf City, NC 28445 | $5,964 |
83 | Eddie C Faircloth | Clinton, NC 28328 | $5,671 |
84 | David Wayne Jones | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $5,669 |
85 | Brian Curtis Hayes | Godwin, NC 28344 | $5,408 |
86 | Matthew West Farms LLC | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $4,787 |
87 | Jason Lee Tyndall | Clinton, NC 28328 | $4,773 |
88 | Greg Allen Best | Newton Grove, NC 28366 | $4,234 |
89 | Craven L Register | Clinton, NC 28328 | $4,021 |
90 | Naylor Farms Inc | Clinton, NC 28328 | $3,891 |
91 | Betsy H Peterson | Clinton, NC 28328 | $3,750 |
92 | Dennis Russell Waller | Mount Olive, NC 28365 | $3,703 |
93 | Hall Brothers Farms Inc | Roseboro, NC 28382 | $3,660 |
94 | Gary N Vann | Clinton, NC 28328 | $3,575 |
95 | Chasen Reid Matthis | Clinton, NC 28328 | $3,468 |
96 | Kenneth Mac Sutton | Clinton, NC 28328 | $3,375 |
97 | Randolph Autry | Garland, NC 28441 | $2,969 |
98 | William Atlas Tyndall Jr | Clinton, NC 28328 | $2,748 |
99 | Gary Tanner | Salemburg, NC 28385 | $2,728 |
100 | Johnny R Tyndall | Clinton, NC 28328 | $2,719 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”