Farm Subsidy information
Scotland County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Scotland County, North Carolina, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 43
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Scotland County, North Carolina totaled $2,474,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mcintyre Farm | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $10,624 |
22 | Philip Futrell | Wagram, NC 28396 | $6,246 |
23 | Elizabeth Jones Turner | Durham, NC 27705 | $6,155 |
24 | J D Carmichael Inc | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $6,086 |
25 | Richard N Locklear | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $4,043 |
26 | John D Stewart | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $4,018 |
27 | Juniper Land Co | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $3,407 |
28 | Burns Farms Inc | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $2,766 |
29 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $2,673 |
30 | Joseph R Warwick Jr | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $2,192 |
31 | Elizabeth Ann Jones Turner Revocable Trust | Durham, NC 27705 | $1,742 |
32 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $1,368 |
33 | Thomas Locklear | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $975 |
34 | Rockdale Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $818 |
35 | Sara Jane Pate | Southern Pines, NC 28387 | $812 |
36 | C & L Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $686 |
37 | Mike Miller Farms LLC | Rowland, NC 28383 | $672 |
38 | Purser Farms LLC | Swansboro, NC 28584 | $366 |
39 | Sinclair Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $197 |
40 | , | $177 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”