Deficiency Payment in Scotland County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 91
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Scotland County, North Carolina totaled $82,669 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | David L Burns | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $-280 |
62 | John C Muse | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $-283 |
63 | Dale Samuel Gibson | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $-302 |
64 | Joe D Manis | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $-316 |
65 | Fred Rushing | Gibson, NC 28343 | $-346 |
66 | Mary Lois James Est | Maxton, NC 28364 | $-385 |
67 | Nancy M Hodges | Red Springs, NC 28377 | $-402 |
68 | J M Mcgregor | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $-430 |
69 | Miller Farms Of Rowland Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $-430 |
70 | Thomas E Gibson Jr | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $-533 |
71 | W G Tatum Farm | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $-610 |
72 | L D Newton Jr | Mc Coll, SC 29570 | $-647 |
73 | Southern Gin & Fert Co Inc | Gibson, NC 28343 | $-651 |
74 | Gary A Blue | Maxton, NC 28364 | $-697 |
75 | Mcrimmon Farms Inc | Rowland, NC 28383 | $-737 |
76 | William Craig Wright | Hamlet, NC 28345 | $-1,001 |
77 | Thomas E Gibson Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $-1,106 |
78 | William Floyd Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $-1,218 |
79 | John M Mclaurin | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $-1,300 |
80 | W Cooper Lee | Bennettsville, SC 29512 | $-1,713 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”