Loan Deficiency in Scotland County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 102
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Scotland County, North Carolina totaled $5,225,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Snead Brothers Farm | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $733,824 |
2 | Juniper Land Co | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $582,812 |
3 | Harvey Z Edge Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $556,082 |
4 | Haynes Stone Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $358,385 |
5 | Stone Farms Inc | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $278,617 |
6 | Sinclair Corp | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $209,436 |
7 | Carmichael Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28353 | $176,039 |
8 | T G Gibson Farms | Gibson, NC 28343 | $168,853 |
9 | J P Locklear Jr | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $164,940 |
10 | Spring Hills Farms Inc | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $138,257 |
11 | David E Breeden | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $129,618 |
12 | John M Mclaurin | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $117,405 |
13 | G Brownie Gainey Jr | Laurel Hill, NC 28351 | $107,198 |
14 | Hagler Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $103,078 |
15 | Thomas E Gibson Jr | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $100,550 |
16 | Philip Futrell | Wagram, NC 28396 | $94,604 |
17 | Dale Samuel Gibson | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $93,925 |
18 | Bryan G Hagler | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $70,906 |
19 | Hendrix Livestock Inc | Raeford, NC 28376 | $55,007 |
20 | Thomas E Gibson Farms | Laurinburg, NC 28352 | $52,083 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>