Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Stanly County, North Carolina, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 66
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Stanly County, North Carolina totaled $378,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Daryl W Hatley | New London, NC 28127 | $5,405 |
22 | L Landon Mullis | New London, NC 28127 | $5,003 |
23 | Keng Yang | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $4,783 |
24 | Betty R Thompson | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $2,258 |
25 | Gerald M Mcswain | Norwood, NC 28128 | $2,093 |
26 | Ernest D Coley | Norwood, NC 28128 | $1,933 |
27 | Harold Joe Ingold | Mocksville, NC 27028 | $1,774 |
28 | Shelly J Smith | Norwood, NC 28128 | $1,575 |
29 | Tony W Deese | Norwood, NC 28128 | $1,558 |
30 | Kyle H Almond | New London, NC 28127 | $1,117 |
31 | Ronnie E Dry | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $1,078 |
32 | Robert L Hill Jr | Oakboro, NC 28129 | $1,041 |
33 | W Eugene Smith | Norwood, NC 28128 | $1,001 |
34 | Don M Russell | Oakboro, NC 28129 | $1,001 |
35 | Larry W Helms | Oakboro, NC 28129 | $980 |
36 | R Durayne Whitley | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $970 |
37 | Hubert Lee Almond | Stanfield, NC 28163 | $898 |
38 | Lloyd C Austin | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $895 |
39 | William P Crawley Jr | Richfield, NC 28137 | $870 |
40 | Jerry L Burleson | Albemarle, NC 28001 | $838 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”