Farm Subsidy information
Wilkes County, North Carolina
Total Subsidies in Wilkes County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 951
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wilkes County, North Carolina totaled $24,086,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Archie Williams | Roaring River, NC 28669 | $24,958 |
122 | Mary D Everhardt | Millers Creek, NC 28651 | $24,941 |
123 | Janie W Cheek | Ronda, NC 28670 | $24,918 |
124 | William Porter Jr | Roaring River, NC 28669 | $24,698 |
125 | Allen W Mathis | Roaring River, NC 28669 | $24,054 |
126 | James Roy Martin | Ronda, NC 28670 | $23,609 |
127 | Benny L Layell | Elkin, NC 28621 | $23,599 |
128 | Rex Jerry Martin | Ronda, NC 28670 | $23,397 |
129 | Tony N Carter | Roaring River, NC 28669 | $23,295 |
130 | Michael Payne | Elkin, NC 28621 | $23,151 |
131 | Charles Ferguson | Boomer, NC 28606 | $22,985 |
132 | Edward R Miller | North Wilkesboro, NC 28659 | $22,478 |
133 | James David Parsons | Millers Creek, NC 28651 | $21,658 |
134 | Linda M Wiles | Hays, NC 28635 | $21,454 |
135 | Michael Eric Grose | Ferguson, NC 28624 | $21,256 |
136 | Ray V Garris III | Roaring River, NC 28669 | $21,246 |
137 | Phillip R Darnell | Ronda, NC 28670 | $21,163 |
138 | Scotty Wayne Mathis | Roaring River, NC 28669 | $20,857 |
139 | Kay P Dechant | Asheville, NC 28804 | $20,741 |
140 | Shilohs Garden LLC | Millers Creek, NC 28651 | $20,602 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”