Market Loss Assistance Program in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 565
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $4,417,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Batts Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $41,236 |
22 | Lamm Farms | Sims, NC 27880 | $41,006 |
23 | Stallings Farm | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $40,552 |
24 | William S Bass Jr | Lucama, NC 27851 | $39,481 |
25 | Tim & Michael Barnes Farms | Lucama, NC 27851 | $39,084 |
26 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $38,542 |
27 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $37,058 |
28 | Zack R Bissette Jr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $36,520 |
29 | John W Daniel Jr | Elm City, NC 27822 | $36,293 |
30 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $35,512 |
31 | Pittman Brothers Farm | Wilson, NC 27893 | $35,310 |
32 | Mayo Farms Of Wilson Inc | Kenly, NC 27542 | $35,099 |
33 | Bissett Produce Co Inc | Spring Hope, NC 27882 | $34,727 |
34 | Edward & Hardy Pittman Partnershi | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $33,316 |
35 | Donald Winborne | Sims, NC 27880 | $32,183 |
36 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $32,009 |
37 | Ray Flowers Estate | Elm City, NC 27822 | $31,764 |
38 | Joseph D Gardner | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $31,003 |
39 | Jeffrey L Barnes | Lucama, NC 27851 | $30,809 |
40 | Harrells Agri Enterprises | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $28,435 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”