Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 107
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $6,623,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Edward & Hardy Pittman Partnershi | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $37,590 |
42 | Edward K Gardner | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $36,456 |
43 | Travis W Aycock | Lucama, NC 27851 | $32,156 |
44 | Ernestine Gardner | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $29,363 |
45 | Ernestine Gardner | Fountain, NC 27829 | $29,363 |
46 | Thomas O Pritcher | Wilson, NC 27896 | $27,440 |
47 | Kendall T Nichols | Sims, NC 27880 | $27,361 |
48 | Robert Bryan Lamm | Wilson, NC 27893 | $26,618 |
49 | Donnie H Nichols | Bailey, NC 27807 | $23,037 |
50 | Spencer Blake Davis | Bailey, NC 27807 | $22,920 |
51 | Donnie Hugh Baker Jr | Fountain, NC 27829 | $22,311 |
52 | Newsome Agri Operations Inc | Fremont, NC 27830 | $20,571 |
53 | Hocutt Brothers Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $19,794 |
54 | Futrell Brothers Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $17,529 |
55 | Russell Austin Davis | Sims, NC 27880 | $16,412 |
56 | Robbie Allen Webb | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $15,787 |
57 | Tyler Bunting | Elm City, NC 27822 | $14,893 |
58 | Joseph Chris Barfield | Lucama, NC 27851 | $14,499 |
59 | Thomas R Beamon | Walstonburg, NC 27888 | $12,803 |
60 | Donnie Tyner Farms Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $12,346 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”