Cotton Ginning Program in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $601,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $107,128 |
2 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $95,298 |
3 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $55,816 |
4 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $51,088 |
5 | Williford Sons LLC | Elm City, NC 27822 | $43,270 |
6 | Tyner Farms Partners | Elm City, NC 27822 | $37,916 |
7 | Sullivan Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $36,850 |
8 | Batts Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $33,610 |
9 | Scott Brothers Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $20,278 |
10 | Joseph Lee Gardner | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $19,238 |
11 | Edward K Gardner | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $18,822 |
12 | John M Gardner | Macclesfield, NC 27852 | $18,822 |
13 | Gerald Tyner Jr Farms Inc | Elm City, NC 27822 | $15,474 |
14 | Lamm Farms | Sims, NC 27880 | $13,492 |
15 | Futrell Brothers Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $11,176 |
16 | Michael Dee Mumford | Lucama, NC 27851 | $8,727 |
17 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $6,539 |
18 | R B Lancaster & Sons Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $4,870 |
19 | Callie Morris Williford III | Elm City, NC 27822 | $2,108 |
20 | Jeffrey Scott Boykin | Sims, NC 27880 | $552 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>