Total Commodity Programs in Wilson County, North Carolina, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,567
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wilson County, North Carolina totaled $114,834,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vick Family Farms Partnership | Wilson, NC 27896 | $4,685,289 |
2 | Rock Ridge Farm Partnership | Wilson, NC 27893 | $4,422,116 |
3 | Lancaster Properties | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $4,288,225 |
4 | Scott Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $4,213,991 |
5 | Marion L Pridgen Farms Inc | Wilson, NC 27894 | $3,628,652 |
6 | Sharp Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $2,323,512 |
7 | Tyner Farms Partners | Elm City, NC 27822 | $1,984,036 |
8 | R J Hinnant & Sons Farms | Kenly, NC 27542 | $1,962,829 |
9 | R B Lancaster & Sons Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $1,783,358 |
10 | Agrarian Inc | Stantonsburg, NC 27883 | $1,511,296 |
11 | Hocutt Farms Inc | Sims, NC 27880 | $1,510,924 |
12 | Bass Family Farms LLC | Lucama, NC 27851 | $1,487,442 |
13 | Batts Farms | Elm City, NC 27822 | $1,379,580 |
14 | Earl Sullivan | Lucama, NC 27851 | $1,332,587 |
15 | E J Vick Farming Co LLC | Wilson, NC 27896 | $1,322,680 |
16 | Lamm Farms | Sims, NC 27880 | $1,287,951 |
17 | Barnes Farming Corp | Spring Hope, NC 27882 | $1,254,466 |
18 | Williford Sons | Elm City, NC 27822 | $1,250,498 |
19 | Scott Brothers Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $1,140,596 |
20 | Sullivan Farms Inc | Lucama, NC 27851 | $1,073,596 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>