Livestock Forage Disaster Program in North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 12,258
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in North Dakota totaled $213,506,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Thomas Reiger | Rugby, ND 58368 | $147,168 |
82 | John Benjamin Grann | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $145,738 |
83 | Donald Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $145,476 |
84 | Cody Johnson | Baker, MT 59313 | $145,236 |
85 | Gregory Mark Heen | Williston, ND 58801 | $145,100 |
86 | Behm Farms | Burlington, ND 58722 | $144,740 |
87 | Robert Mark Makelky | Beach, ND 58621 | $144,396 |
88 | Justin Lund | Ross, ND 58776 | $143,656 |
89 | L Double Bar Ranch | Amidon, ND 58620 | $143,433 |
90 | Henry Ernest Meyer | Flasher, ND 58535 | $143,372 |
91 | Kim Albert Entze | Golden Valley, ND 58541 | $142,491 |
92 | Curtis Meidinger | Zeeland, ND 58581 | $141,436 |
93 | Douglas Raymond Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $141,389 |
94 | Douglas R Mosser | Beach, ND 58621 | $140,165 |
95 | Raymond Donald Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $139,965 |
96 | Robert Schmidt | Hensler, ND 58530 | $139,752 |
97 | Mrnak Ranch Partnership | Bowman, ND 58623 | $139,231 |
98 | John Andrew Marshall | Towner, ND 58788 | $138,546 |
99 | Larry Fred Haman | Towner, ND 58788 | $137,938 |
100 | Tyler Lee Elston | Spiritwood, ND 58481 | $137,506 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”