Farm Subsidy information
North Dakota
Total Subsidies in North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 28,090
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in North Dakota totaled $2,449,000,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Adams Family Farm | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $578,462 |
82 | Tracy Hoherz | Mandan, ND 58554 | $575,955 |
83 | Hiatt Honey LLC | Ephrata, WA 98823 | $573,992 |
84 | Bear Farms | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $570,545 |
85 | Christian Charles | Carrington, ND 58421 | $567,966 |
86 | Dean Richard Gerving | Mandan, ND 58554 | $566,747 |
87 | Andersen Farm | Oakes, ND 58474 | $563,189 |
88 | Heuchert Willow Creek Ranch | Hensel, ND 58241 | $559,115 |
89 | Bergh Farms | Forman, ND 58032 | $556,465 |
90 | R & C Mittleider Farms Inc | Tappen, ND 58487 | $556,198 |
91 | Dl Farms LLC | Buxton, ND 58218 | $550,680 |
92 | Mountrail Farms Partnership | Ross, ND 58776 | $548,686 |
93 | Miller Family Farm | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $543,575 |
94 | , | $542,066 | |
95 | Jorgenson Farms, II | Leeds, ND 58346 | $536,293 |
96 | Three M Farms Partnership | Hecla, SD 57446 | $535,921 |
97 | Gregory Allen Van Beek | Pollock, SD 57648 | $535,701 |
98 | Burchill Farms | Luverne, ND 58056 | $535,540 |
99 | Wayne D Hepper | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $532,842 |
100 | Kim G Saueressig | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $530,372 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”