Direct Payment Program in North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 48,682
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in North Dakota totaled $2,301,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Wayne & Roxanne Gapp Farm | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $613,634 |
82 | Nelson Farm Enterprises Part | Amenia, ND 58004 | $613,252 |
83 | Thompson David/marcella | Minot, ND 58701 | $606,248 |
84 | Reimers General Partnership | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $605,265 |
85 | Rgm Farms Randall R Emanuelson Etal Ptr | Drayton, ND 58225 | $602,662 |
86 | Bill Weber & Son Farm | Thompson, ND 58278 | $594,328 |
87 | Giermann Partnership | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $584,268 |
88 | David & Teresa Braaten Farms | Kindred, ND 58051 | $579,458 |
89 | Bennington Farms Partnership | Park River, ND 58270 | $578,472 |
90 | Qual Grain | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $576,461 |
91 | Reiten Farms | Petersburg, ND 58272 | $571,009 |
92 | T E Otoole Farms | Crystal, ND 58222 | $569,288 |
93 | Steichen Farms Jv | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $567,356 |
94 | Gullickson Farms | Spiritwood, ND 58481 | $564,391 |
95 | Jonasson Farms | Milton, ND 58260 | $563,694 |
96 | K & K Cronquist Jv | Gilby, ND 58235 | $563,543 |
97 | Gudajtes/john Farm | Minto, ND 58261 | $563,466 |
98 | Lemnus Farms | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $558,011 |
99 | Mccann Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $552,041 |
100 | M & M Farms | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $546,440 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”