Loan Deficiency in North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 41,317
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in North Dakota totaled $1,425,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Loren A Schulz | Edgeley, ND 58433 | $431,094 |
102 | Arnold Nels Anderson | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $430,374 |
103 | Wayne Frederick Deering | Alamo, ND 58830 | $425,306 |
104 | C & W Belter Farm Jt Vt | Leonard, ND 58052 | $423,833 |
105 | Daniel Lester Zimmerman | Amenia, ND 58004 | $422,497 |
106 | Douglas Lee Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $421,662 |
107 | Richard James Risan | Parshall, ND 58770 | $421,550 |
108 | Roger Gunlikson | Zahl, ND 58856 | $418,327 |
109 | Phillip Richard Moen | Arnegard, ND 58835 | $415,524 |
110 | Lance Alan Zimmerman | Garrison, ND 58540 | $414,067 |
111 | Kelly Gunlikson | Williston, ND 58801 | $410,253 |
112 | Follman Farms | York, ND 58386 | $408,839 |
113 | Mary Elizabeth Meyer | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $407,872 |
114 | Gerald Anthony Meyer | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $407,872 |
115 | Donald Edward Gregoire | Donnybrook, ND 58734 | $407,846 |
116 | Ronald James Ehlis | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $407,573 |
117 | Stuart Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $406,963 |
118 | Ordell Johnson & Sons Fm | Cummings, ND 58223 | $406,580 |
119 | Teresa Nielsen | New England, ND 58647 | $405,701 |
120 | T And M Farm Co | Portal, ND 58772 | $405,629 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”