Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1,101 to 1,120 of 4,577
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in North Dakota totaled $218,850,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1101 | Faul Jerome/agnes Jv | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $68,962 |
1102 | Circle Y Farms Inc | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $68,917 |
1103 | Loren Ellefson Farm Inc | Milnor, ND 58060 | $68,911 |
1104 | Harold James Zerface | Hope, ND 58046 | $68,824 |
1105 | Casey James Burchill | Luverne, ND 58056 | $68,806 |
1106 | William Bertram | Valley City, ND 58072 | $68,768 |
1107 | Wallace James Carlson Jr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $68,740 |
1108 | Roger Joseph Anderson | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $68,664 |
1109 | Carter W Gylland | Colfax, ND 58018 | $68,589 |
1110 | Monte Steven Gylland | Colfax, ND 58018 | $68,588 |
1111 | Ryan Braaten Farms Inc | Finley, ND 58230 | $68,552 |
1112 | Bradley Von Carroll | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $68,513 |
1113 | Richard Allan Flanders | Calvin, ND 58323 | $68,511 |
1114 | Bosse Bros | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $68,382 |
1115 | Grindeland Farms Inc | Hatton, ND 58240 | $68,338 |
1116 | Dennis Dale Mayer | Gackle, ND 58442 | $68,276 |
1117 | Curtis Bradley Riemer | Hillsboro, ND 58045 | $68,229 |
1118 | Daniel Thomas Spiekermeier | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $68,180 |
1119 | Keith Arthur Hall | Upham, ND 58789 | $68,148 |
1120 | Gregory Delmer Schulz | Davenport, ND 58021 | $68,077 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”