Total Emergency Relief Program in North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 121 to 140 of 15,022
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in North Dakota totaled $1,157,000,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
121 | Spencer Bina | Park River, ND 58270 | $468,579 |
122 | Kim G Saueressig | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $467,673 |
123 | Ridl Farms | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $467,447 |
124 | Casey Krush | Wilton, ND 58579 | $466,761 |
125 | Three M Farms Partnership | Hecla, SD 57446 | $466,030 |
126 | Shane Robin Sand | Emerado, ND 58228 | $462,714 |
127 | Tmt Farms | Cleveland, ND 58424 | $461,074 |
128 | Lee Guscette Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $459,291 |
129 | Westlind Group | Hampden, ND 58338 | $457,871 |
130 | Chad Wendel | Valley City, ND 58072 | $455,215 |
131 | Lynn & Donna Farms | Munich, ND 58352 | $455,133 |
132 | Stephanie Bachmeier | Carrington, ND 58421 | $454,575 |
133 | Craig Weigel | Napoleon, ND 58561 | $451,459 |
134 | J R Perleberg | Pingree, ND 58476 | $451,351 |
135 | Sweet River Company LLC | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $449,449 |
136 | Killoran Partnership | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $449,449 |
137 | K Farms Inc | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $448,963 |
138 | Rgm Farms Randall R Emanuelson Etal Ptr | Drayton, ND 58225 | $448,452 |
139 | Gregory Allen Van Beek | Pollock, SD 57648 | $445,718 |
140 | Brenda Dawn Zink | Carrington, ND 58421 | $445,458 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”