Conservation Reserve Program in North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 50,697
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in North Dakota totaled $2,716,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Dean Alan Goter | Woodworth, ND 58496 | $706,951 |
142 | Fred Hofmann | Medina, ND 58467 | $702,946 |
143 | Verlla Geloff | Sterling, ND 58572 | $702,383 |
144 | Roger Arnold Artz | Antler, ND 58711 | $700,215 |
145 | Michael Louis Forster | Lidgerwood, ND 58053 | $698,015 |
146 | Edward Schmidt | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $697,645 |
147 | Wilbur Hintz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $697,488 |
148 | Ronnie G Hendrickson | Mekinock, ND 58258 | $696,390 |
149 | Fred Addison Lukens | Aneta, ND 58212 | $695,384 |
150 | Donald E Halverson | Armour, SD 57313 | $695,347 |
151 | Matthew J Weinmann | Harvey, ND 58341 | $694,760 |
152 | Rick Herbel | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $694,692 |
153 | Harley L Hiam | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $694,094 |
154 | James H Mahrer | Forman, ND 58032 | $691,982 |
155 | Roger Beaver | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $690,379 |
156 | Gene Spichke | Balfour, ND 58712 | $690,273 |
157 | Dayne Andrew Headland | Ypsilanti, ND 58497 | $690,105 |
158 | Ronald Beyer | Pelican Rapids, MN 56572 | $689,757 |
159 | Shirley Trosen | Larimore, ND 58251 | $689,603 |
160 | B Anthony Petterson | Fort Collins, CO 80524 | $687,933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”