Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in North Dakota, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 8,456
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in North Dakota totaled $83,038,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | First State Bank Of Cando ** | Cando, ND 58324 | $275,288 |
22 | Heartland State Bank ** | Edgeley, ND 58433 | $267,309 |
23 | Unison Bank ** | Pingree, ND 58476 | $233,945 |
24 | Dacotah Bank ** | Rolla, ND 58367 | $229,929 |
25 | Winter Farms Family Ptnr | Oriska, ND 58063 | $223,426 |
26 | Hometown Credit Union ** | Kulm, ND 58456 | $212,090 |
27 | Haugen Farms Jv | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $198,555 |
28 | A & M Farms | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $196,274 |
29 | Dalrymple Farms | Casselton, ND 58012 | $168,980 |
30 | Kohler Farms Partnership | Valley City, ND 58072 | $165,805 |
31 | Fugleberg Farms Partnership | Hope, ND 58046 | $162,361 |
32 | Citizens State Bank ** | Anton, TX 79313 | $131,816 |
33 | Bell Bank ** | Fargo, ND 58103 | $128,808 |
34 | Dakota Western Bank ** | Bowman, ND 58623 | $127,840 |
35 | Elm River Credit Union ** | Kindred, ND 58051 | $127,815 |
36 | Loff Farms Partnership | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $126,996 |
37 | Merchants Bank ** | Rugby, ND 58368 | $125,753 |
38 | Plains Commerce Bank ** | Watertown, SD 57201 | $124,509 |
39 | Mcilonie Family Farms | Pingree, ND 58476 | $121,734 |
40 | Kindred State Bank ** | Kindred, ND 58051 | $121,731 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”