Counter Cyclical Program in North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 29,169
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in North Dakota totaled $81,336,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gibbon Farm & Ranch Inc | Milnor, ND 58060 | $113,015 |
22 | Mill Farms | Wahpeton, ND 58075 | $109,020 |
23 | Charles Louie Haus | Hankinson, ND 58041 | $108,889 |
24 | Luther Farms Jtvt | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $107,736 |
25 | James Dan & Wm Dotzenrod Fm Prtsp | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $106,338 |
26 | Thomas Dean Mcinnes | Fargo, ND 58103 | $105,909 |
27 | Willow Bank Hutterian Association | Edgeley, ND 58433 | $99,988 |
28 | Ross Leo Thorpe | Oakes, ND 58474 | $94,107 |
29 | Bosse Bros | Cogswell, ND 58017 | $92,696 |
30 | Erlandson Farms Ptshp | Oakes, ND 58474 | $91,345 |
31 | A & M Farms | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $90,504 |
32 | Schwab Bros | Englevale, ND 58033 | $90,265 |
33 | Loff Farms | Colfax, ND 58018 | $90,040 |
34 | Richard Rydell Farms Inc | Fairmount, ND 58030 | $89,995 |
35 | Halvorson Farms | Leonard, ND 58052 | $88,410 |
36 | Kristine Lynn Fliehs | Aberdeen, SD 57401 | $87,620 |
37 | Standing Rock Farms | Fort Yates, ND 58538 | $86,669 |
38 | Ralph/cleo Thompson Jtvt | Page, ND 58064 | $86,172 |
39 | Russell Casper Mauch | Barney, ND 58008 | $84,769 |
40 | Centennial Farm | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $84,158 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”