Total Commodity Programs in North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 83,136
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in North Dakota totaled $11,188,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | American Bank Center ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $5,382,597 |
22 | Mcmillan Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $5,382,525 |
23 | Johnson Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $5,318,924 |
24 | First Community Credit Union ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $5,254,966 |
25 | Banknorth ** | Arthur, ND 58006 | $5,145,766 |
26 | Noeske Farms | Valley City, ND 58072 | $5,022,753 |
27 | Longtin Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $4,759,516 |
28 | Peoples State Bank Of Velva | Velva, ND 58790 | $4,567,644 |
29 | Tmt Farms | Cleveland, ND 58424 | $4,493,206 |
30 | North Star Community Credit Union ** | Maddock, ND 58348 | $4,411,994 |
31 | Starion Financial ** | Mandan, ND 58554 | $4,281,812 |
32 | Ratzlaff Farms | Munich, ND 58352 | $4,262,973 |
33 | Bjornstad Farms | Walhalla, ND 58282 | $4,215,188 |
34 | Qual Grain | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $4,176,176 |
35 | Dacotah Bank ** | Rolla, ND 58367 | $4,134,178 |
36 | Dakota West Farms | New England, ND 58647 | $4,094,524 |
37 | Welstad Farms | Newburg, ND 58762 | $3,996,337 |
38 | Bendickson Farms General Partnership | Garrison, ND 58540 | $3,971,434 |
39 | Westgard Farms | Parshall, ND 58770 | $3,967,246 |
40 | Farmers & Merchants State Bank ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $3,957,608 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”