Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Adams County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 420
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $24,008,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Evenson Angus | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $180,549 |
22 | Buckmier Brothers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $169,213 |
23 | Rodney Erwin Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $164,093 |
24 | Steven Craig Wegner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $160,323 |
25 | Nathan Howard Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $155,342 |
26 | Russell Earl Doe | Reeder, ND 58649 | $153,222 |
27 | Ben O Eaton | Reeder, ND 58649 | $152,071 |
28 | Barbara Rose | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $150,215 |
29 | Linda Lee Doe | Reeder, ND 58649 | $147,608 |
30 | Ryan Ray Honeyman | Reeder, ND 58649 | $147,491 |
31 | Larry A Anderson | Regent, ND 58650 | $137,914 |
32 | Rodney Wayne Lutz | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $129,470 |
33 | Ross Alan Engraf | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $122,334 |
34 | J & M Farms Ltd | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $121,646 |
35 | Earl Wayne Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $114,394 |
36 | Jon Harvey Markegard | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $106,306 |
37 | Nathan Burnell Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $104,899 |
38 | Bradley Paul Lee | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $103,193 |
39 | Jamie Lynn Enerson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $102,459 |
40 | Jeremy Lynn Stadheim | Reeder, ND 58649 | $99,791 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”