Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Adams County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 420
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $24,008,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John Allen Weaver | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $99,237 |
42 | , | $92,636 | |
43 | Billy R Holt | Ralph, SD 57650 | $91,809 |
44 | Eugene Charles Burrer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $88,522 |
45 | Bruce Leslie Hagen | Reeder, ND 58649 | $88,003 |
46 | Nathan J Weaver | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $87,564 |
47 | Dustin Michael Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $87,163 |
48 | Scott Lauren Zimmermann | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $86,825 |
49 | Gregory Lyle Seamands | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $84,259 |
50 | Michael Lynn Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $81,814 |
51 | Frank Adam Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $80,488 |
52 | Kathryn Mae Donner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $80,109 |
53 | Benjamin Edward Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $78,920 |
54 | Patrick Erdman | Ralph, SD 57650 | $76,535 |
55 | Hayden William Evans | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $75,083 |
56 | Danny Duane Engraf | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $73,130 |
57 | Kevin W Hagen | Reeder, ND 58649 | $72,247 |
58 | Douglas Bruce Donner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $69,660 |
59 | Grand River Honey Company | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $68,445 |
60 | Blake Honeyman | Reeder, ND 58649 | $65,455 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”