Total Commodity Programs in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,382
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $93,350,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Raymond Zent | Mott, ND 58646 | $407,858 |
62 | Kevin Symanowski | Reeder, ND 58649 | $405,320 |
63 | Raymond Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $397,662 |
64 | Warren Dean Hintz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $390,903 |
65 | Donald Dean Melling | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $376,560 |
66 | Victoria L Sonn | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $373,730 |
67 | Rodney Erwin Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $369,253 |
68 | Rhett L Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $368,272 |
69 | Terry Michael Miller | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $364,003 |
70 | John Froelich | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $355,769 |
71 | Wayne Allen Weishaar | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $349,777 |
72 | Eugene Charles Burrer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $349,352 |
73 | Roger Sonn | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $344,086 |
74 | Miller Farm & Ranch | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $344,066 |
75 | Tanner Sonn | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $343,037 |
76 | Terry Lynn Laufer | Mott, ND 58646 | $342,088 |
77 | Dennis L Rustan | New England, ND 58647 | $340,792 |
78 | Donald Leroy Howe | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $339,639 |
79 | Scott Seim | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $333,430 |
80 | Earl Laufer 4/8/99 Revocable Trus | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $324,793 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”