Total Commodity Programs in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 101 to 120 of 1,382
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $93,350,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
101 | Roger T Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $275,385 |
102 | Sherrie Feist | Enning, SD 57737 | $272,151 |
103 | Bradley Paul Lee | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $267,232 |
104 | Keith Ray Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $264,114 |
105 | Irving Melling Estate | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $259,004 |
106 | Morgan Berg | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $253,400 |
107 | Jimmy Lyle Seamands | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $250,915 |
108 | Mitchell Ray Daley | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $242,650 |
109 | Jamie Lynn Enerson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $237,568 |
110 | Kelly James Howe | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $235,918 |
111 | Shawn Micheal Pierce | Scranton, ND 58653 | $230,455 |
112 | Donald Robert Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $229,526 |
113 | Hofland Ranch | Reeder, ND 58649 | $227,012 |
114 | Clifford & Eileen Engraf Family T | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $225,645 |
115 | Commercial Bank Of Mott ** | Mott, ND 58646 | $223,968 |
116 | Terry L Hoffman | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $217,503 |
117 | Dale Edwin Skogen | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $214,382 |
118 | Allan Everette Earsley | Reeder, ND 58649 | $213,881 |
119 | David Lee Seifert | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $210,976 |
120 | Matt Korang | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $210,858 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”