Loan Deficiency in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 522
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $10,675,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Michael David Merwin | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $13,790 |
142 | Cole Thomas Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $13,671 |
143 | Donald D Melling Jr | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $13,379 |
144 | Arthur Henry Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $13,144 |
145 | Robert Duane Yohe | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $13,060 |
146 | Roy F Mellmer | Reeder, ND 58649 | $12,982 |
147 | William Robert Austin | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $12,737 |
148 | Allen Markegard Est | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $12,715 |
149 | Charles O Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $12,575 |
150 | Sheldon Jay Bohnhoff | New England, ND 58647 | $12,512 |
151 | Robert Louis Bohnhoff | New England, ND 58647 | $12,512 |
152 | Carol Jean Wegner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $12,497 |
153 | Harvey Loren Oase | Reeder, ND 58649 | $12,104 |
154 | Theodore Hochhalter Living Trust | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $11,990 |
155 | Jeremy Lynn Stadheim | Reeder, ND 58649 | $11,845 |
156 | Eugene R Thompson & Evelyn Thomps | Reeder, ND 58649 | $11,752 |
157 | Dejon Erick Bakken | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $11,682 |
158 | James B Hallen | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $11,620 |
159 | Merrill Parker Jr | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $11,538 |
160 | Deborah Olson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $11,347 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”