Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Adams County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 161 to 180 of 535
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $19,063,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
161 | Steven Ron West | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $12,166 |
162 | William Patrick Hourigan | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $12,070 |
163 | Robert L Dietz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $11,660 |
164 | John Ludwig Wegner | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $11,612 |
165 | Rick Allen Zimmermann | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $11,594 |
166 | Edith Christman Q-tip Subchapter S Trust | Aberdeen, SD 57402 | $11,372 |
167 | Blowers Partnership Lllp | Bismarck, ND 58504 | $11,260 |
168 | Clarence Gaugler | Thornton, CO 80229 | $11,172 |
169 | James Alan Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $10,950 |
170 | Paul R Julsrud | Rochester, MN 55902 | $10,909 |
171 | John Vliem | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $10,762 |
172 | Kathleen Leann Vliem | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $10,737 |
173 | Jesse Horner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $10,697 |
174 | Cbr Ventures Llp | Rugby, ND 58368 | $10,677 |
175 | Jeffrey Earl Strehlow | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $10,597 |
176 | Mike Shane Dauwen | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $10,566 |
177 | Preston Hochhalter | Mesa, AZ 85208 | $10,551 |
178 | Dennis L Johnson | Sturgis, SD 57785 | $10,452 |
179 | Shelia Srb | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $10,384 |
180 | Juliana R Skogen | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $10,160 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”