Farm Subsidy information
Adams County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Adams County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 420
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $24,008,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eaton Farms | Reeder, ND 58649 | $1,696,618 |
2 | Scott Edward Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $347,114 |
3 | Thomas N Rusch | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $333,384 |
4 | Timothy John Wegner | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $291,969 |
5 | T2 Honey Company LLC | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $286,078 |
6 | Jacki Vaughn Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $261,863 |
7 | Cole Thomas Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $261,102 |
8 | Billie Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $254,279 |
9 | Kalen Edward Manthei | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $250,108 |
10 | Kelly James Howe | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $246,927 |
11 | Dan Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $246,433 |
12 | Jordan Jacob Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $246,161 |
13 | Howe Herefords Inc | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $229,313 |
14 | Tyler Kostelecky | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $224,041 |
15 | Mitch Miller Estate | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $215,012 |
16 | Michael Ray Mellmer | Reeder, ND 58649 | $214,953 |
17 | Terry Michael Miller | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $201,216 |
18 | James Kilzer | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $197,218 |
19 | Rhett L Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $193,561 |
20 | Beverly Rose Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $185,240 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>