Conservation Reserve Program in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 866
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $45,386,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Gene E & Marilyn A Engraf Joint V | Reeder, ND 58649 | $709,090 |
2 | Wilbur Hintz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $697,488 |
3 | Schoeder Family Lllp | Alexandria, VA 22314 | $684,517 |
4 | Dennis Alan Markegard | Golden Valley, MN 55422 | $620,152 |
5 | Marguerite Schmaltz | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $533,613 |
6 | Robert Kilzer | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $490,409 |
7 | Delbert Duane Hintz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $437,570 |
8 | David L Merwin | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $413,601 |
9 | Michael Martin Schmaltz | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $389,732 |
10 | Jerold Follmer | Aurora, CO 80014 | $373,154 |
11 | Warren Dean Hintz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $336,001 |
12 | Harvey Hochhalter | Valley City, ND 58072 | $318,411 |
13 | Betty Manolovits | Mott, ND 58646 | $316,490 |
14 | William Lawrence Mollman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $306,073 |
15 | Robert C Blaha | Loyal, WI 54446 | $305,745 |
16 | Ron Allen Zimmermann | Lone Tree, CO 80124 | $304,698 |
17 | John Ludwig Wegner | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $301,831 |
18 | Howard Nelson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $301,344 |
19 | Herman W Strehlow | Saint Paul, MN 55117 | $298,120 |
20 | Arthur Henry Huether | Mott, ND 58646 | $295,267 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>