Total Disaster Programs in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 827
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $44,905,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eaton Farms | Reeder, ND 58649 | $2,086,914 |
2 | T2 Honey Company LLC | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $1,586,292 |
3 | Dan Christman | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $831,338 |
4 | Thomas N Rusch | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $696,617 |
5 | Howe Herefords Inc | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $591,672 |
6 | Timothy John Wegner | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $570,048 |
7 | Michael Ray Mellmer | Reeder, ND 58649 | $538,360 |
8 | Russell Earl Doe | Reeder, ND 58649 | $521,288 |
9 | Scott Edward Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $509,486 |
10 | Steven Craig Wegner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $484,879 |
11 | Gene E & Marilyn A Engraf Joint V | Reeder, ND 58649 | $483,242 |
12 | Evenson Angus | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $476,718 |
13 | Bill Christman | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $475,446 |
14 | J & M Farms Ltd | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $470,637 |
15 | Barbara Rose | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $466,251 |
16 | Jeremy Lynn Stadheim | Reeder, ND 58649 | $461,572 |
17 | Ross Alan Engraf | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $439,212 |
18 | Bruce Leslie Hagen | Reeder, ND 58649 | $414,327 |
19 | Earl Wayne Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $407,858 |
20 | Rodney Erwin Wolff | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $389,933 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>