Loan Deficiency in Adams County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 522
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Adams County, North Dakota totaled $10,675,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steven Craig Wegner | Reeder, ND 58649 | $136,790 |
22 | Earl Wayne Ehlers | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $135,068 |
23 | Roger D Wilson | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $132,816 |
24 | John Froelich | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $131,020 |
25 | Terry Roy West | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $127,370 |
26 | Linda Lee Doe | Reeder, ND 58649 | $123,388 |
27 | Stanley Joseph Laufer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $117,362 |
28 | Timothy John Wegner | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $116,890 |
29 | Warren Dean Hintz | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $113,743 |
30 | Rodney L Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $104,912 |
31 | James Alan Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $104,509 |
32 | Douglas John Schackow | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $96,577 |
33 | Evenson Angus | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $95,137 |
34 | Randy Gene Friez | Mott, ND 58646 | $91,454 |
35 | Melvin Terry Gravning | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $86,074 |
36 | Donald Leroy Howe | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $83,730 |
37 | William David Larson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $80,815 |
38 | Raymond Mattis | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $79,496 |
39 | Roger Sonn | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $78,121 |
40 | Sherrie Feist | Enning, SD 57737 | $75,898 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”