Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Barnes County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 49
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $291,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tyler Mcfadgen | Valley City, ND 58072 | $3,399 |
22 | Scott Francis Legge | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $3,264 |
23 | Dwight Gerard Legge | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $3,264 |
24 | John Sadek | Rogers, ND 58479 | $2,712 |
25 | Adam Earl Davis | Page, ND 58064 | $2,666 |
26 | Paul Allen Falstad | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $2,596 |
27 | Tammy Lynn Falstad | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $2,596 |
28 | Michael Baarstad | Nome, ND 58062 | $2,513 |
29 | Schroeder Farms | Valley City, ND 58072 | $2,347 |
30 | Rodd Steven Svenningsen | Luverne, ND 58056 | $2,037 |
31 | Taryl Michael Smith | Litchville, ND 58461 | $1,958 |
32 | Garrett K Mcfadgen | Valley City, ND 58072 | $1,943 |
33 | Evan Andrew Legge | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $1,632 |
34 | James Earl Kuchera | Wyndmere, ND 58081 | $1,626 |
35 | David William Martin | Wheatland, ND 58079 | $1,599 |
36 | Gregory Gene Smith | Marion, ND 58466 | $1,471 |
37 | Keith Arlen Cavett | Nome, ND 58062 | $1,415 |
38 | David Hollinshead | Rogers, ND 58479 | $1,414 |
39 | Dean Edward Haberman | Lamoure, ND 58458 | $1,410 |
40 | , | $1,350 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”