Farm Subsidy information
Barnes County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,254
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $990,987,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Sizer Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $1,890,825 |
42 | Ronald David Kohler | Tower City, ND 58071 | $1,861,191 |
43 | Kelly A Marler | Rogers, ND 58479 | $1,834,781 |
44 | John Larry Jorissen | Valley City, ND 58072 | $1,820,558 |
45 | Dwight Gerard Legge | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $1,786,052 |
46 | D & G Farms | Page, ND 58064 | $1,764,421 |
47 | Fivegen Farms | Valley City, ND 58072 | $1,737,804 |
48 | Maynard Allen Flatt | Valley City, ND 58072 | $1,730,789 |
49 | Clemens Farms Inc | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $1,721,984 |
50 | Quick Farms | Dazey, ND 58429 | $1,710,891 |
51 | Scott Francis Legge | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $1,695,697 |
52 | Skogen Farms | Bozeman, MT 59718 | $1,661,161 |
53 | Clayton Allen Elliott | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $1,644,259 |
54 | Clark Reed Lemley | Hope, ND 58046 | $1,618,251 |
55 | Clear Sky Farm | Valley City, ND 58072 | $1,618,178 |
56 | Jim Duane Lindseth | Page, ND 58064 | $1,612,251 |
57 | Bank Forward ** | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $1,605,957 |
58 | Koldok Farms | Tower City, ND 58071 | $1,588,495 |
59 | R & J Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $1,587,490 |
60 | Larry Lyle Svenningsen | Luverne, ND 58056 | $1,565,657 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”