Farm Subsidy information
Barnes County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Barnes County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 993
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $62,278,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Neil James Amann | Dazey, ND 58429 | $178,811 |
42 | P & B & J Inc | Dazey, ND 58429 | $177,150 |
43 | Henderson Farms Inc | Tower City, ND 58071 | $176,109 |
44 | Matt & Courtney Jorissen Jv | Valley City, ND 58072 | $170,680 |
45 | R 3 Farms Inc | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $170,428 |
46 | James & Patricia Broten Jv | Dazey, ND 58429 | $169,015 |
47 | Nickolai Lawrence Holm | Valley City, ND 58072 | $168,952 |
48 | Marlyn Maasjo | Fingal, ND 58031 | $168,140 |
49 | Sizer Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $164,608 |
50 | Koldok Farms | Tower City, ND 58071 | $160,980 |
51 | Michael John Clemens | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $160,721 |
52 | Clemens Farms Inc | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $160,546 |
53 | Wurzer Farms | Fingal, ND 58031 | $159,844 |
54 | Matthew Powers | Oriska, ND 58063 | $158,855 |
55 | Maynard Allen Flatt | Valley City, ND 58072 | $157,957 |
56 | Delray John Dykstra | Litchville, ND 58461 | $154,390 |
57 | John R Anderson | Oriska, ND 58063 | $153,362 |
58 | Didier Farms | Spiritwood, ND 58481 | $151,954 |
59 | Alicia Kaye Broten | Dazey, ND 58429 | $148,366 |
60 | Mp Farms | Valley City, ND 58072 | $145,924 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”