Farm Subsidy information
Barnes County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Barnes County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 873
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $77,878,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alison Grotberg | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $252,076 |
42 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $249,910 |
43 | Robert Lee Janish Jr | Fingal, ND 58031 | $248,947 |
44 | G & D Baasch Partnership | Oriska, ND 58063 | $248,290 |
45 | Lvr Inc | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $238,166 |
46 | Markus Phillip Mueller | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $237,555 |
47 | Marty Farrell Undem | Rogers, ND 58479 | $236,633 |
48 | Dylan Pesek | Spiritwood, ND 58481 | $236,363 |
49 | Jonathan Lee Buchholz | Nome, ND 58062 | $230,430 |
50 | Douglas Duane Lettenmaier | Litchville, ND 58461 | $225,355 |
51 | George Fredrick Pabst Jr | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $225,239 |
52 | Kyle Myron Petersen | Dazey, ND 58429 | $222,512 |
53 | Koldok Farms | Tower City, ND 58071 | $212,163 |
54 | Blair D Karges | Oriska, ND 58063 | $210,160 |
55 | Tyler Lee Elston | Spiritwood, ND 58481 | $209,458 |
56 | Roger Eugene Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $209,117 |
57 | John Henry Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $208,679 |
58 | Alan Neil Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $208,649 |
59 | John Larry Jorissen | Valley City, ND 58072 | $204,999 |
60 | Daniel Joseph Elston | Rogers, ND 58479 | $203,664 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”