Total Emergency Relief Program in Barnes County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 460
Recipients of Total Emergency Relief Program from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $40,691,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Emergency Relief Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Alison Grotberg | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $250,000 |
42 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $241,290 |
43 | Lvr Inc | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $238,166 |
44 | Markus Phillip Mueller | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $237,555 |
45 | Marty Farrell Undem | Rogers, ND 58479 | $236,633 |
46 | Dylan Pesek | Spiritwood, ND 58481 | $236,363 |
47 | Kyle Myron Petersen | Dazey, ND 58429 | $222,512 |
48 | Robert Lee Janish Jr | Fingal, ND 58031 | $221,306 |
49 | Jonathan Lee Buchholz | Nome, ND 58062 | $220,677 |
50 | Koldok Farms | Tower City, ND 58071 | $212,163 |
51 | G & D Baasch Partnership | Oriska, ND 58063 | $210,927 |
52 | Blair D Karges | Oriska, ND 58063 | $210,160 |
53 | Roger Eugene Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $209,115 |
54 | John Henry Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $208,677 |
55 | Alan Neil Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $208,647 |
56 | George Fredrick Pabst Jr | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $207,519 |
57 | John Larry Jorissen | Valley City, ND 58072 | $204,999 |
58 | Douglas Duane Lettenmaier | Litchville, ND 58461 | $201,673 |
59 | Daniel Joseph Elston | Rogers, ND 58479 | $197,951 |
60 | Michael John Clemens | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $192,722 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”