Loan Deficiency in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,216
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $51,297,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Zacharias Partnership | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $202,854 |
42 | Vernon Raymond Grant | Valley City, ND 58072 | $199,778 |
43 | Dale Jorissen | Rogers, ND 58479 | $197,124 |
44 | Gilbertson Farms Inc | Kathryn, ND 58049 | $193,600 |
45 | Dennis Dean Smith | Tower City, ND 58071 | $193,352 |
46 | James Douglas Quick | Dazey, ND 58429 | $188,176 |
47 | Alan Neil Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $187,703 |
48 | John Henry Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $187,670 |
49 | Conservation Develop Coop | Tower City, ND 58071 | $187,305 |
50 | Roger Eugene Triebold | Oriska, ND 58063 | $186,813 |
51 | Clark Reed Lemley | Hope, ND 58046 | $186,281 |
52 | John Larry Jorissen | Valley City, ND 58072 | $184,870 |
53 | Nelson Farms | Litchville, ND 58461 | $184,441 |
54 | Todd Gerald Wendel | Valley City, ND 58072 | $183,437 |
55 | Richard Kohler | Valley City, ND 58072 | $183,075 |
56 | Louis Nicoli | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $181,492 |
57 | Robert Donald Klein Jr | Sanborn, ND 58480 | $181,327 |
58 | Michael John Clemens | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $180,497 |
59 | Gerald Smith | Tower City, ND 58071 | $180,243 |
60 | Don Glenn Schlotman | Valley City, ND 58072 | $178,921 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”