Counter Cyclical Program in Barnes County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 842
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Barnes County, North Dakota totaled $2,308,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Glenn Koebernick | Rogers, ND 58479 | $7,534 |
82 | Eugene Smith | Marion, ND 58466 | $7,516 |
83 | Bar Lazy S Ranch | Valley City, ND 58072 | $7,338 |
84 | Peter Thomas Paulson | Valley City, ND 58072 | $7,298 |
85 | Jon Earl Klein | Casselton, ND 58012 | $7,217 |
86 | Steven James Nielson | Valley City, ND 58072 | $7,139 |
87 | Phillip Mueller | Valley City, ND 58072 | $7,111 |
88 | Joel Stanley Miedema | Marion, ND 58466 | $7,110 |
89 | Patricia Lillian Broten | Dazey, ND 58429 | $6,998 |
90 | James Olaf Broten | Dazey, ND 58429 | $6,998 |
91 | Warren Van Bruggen | Marion, ND 58466 | $6,988 |
92 | Gregory John Nelson | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $6,928 |
93 | Colin Harold Conley | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $6,916 |
94 | Colleen Helen Conley | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $6,916 |
95 | Earl Thomas Christensen | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $6,768 |
96 | Arnold Roorda | Jamestown, ND 58401 | $6,759 |
97 | Durward Otterness | Tower City, ND 58071 | $6,755 |
98 | Duane Formo | Litchville, ND 58461 | $6,702 |
99 | Mark Formo | Litchville, ND 58461 | $6,702 |
100 | Lloyd R Wieland | Dazey, ND 58429 | $6,635 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”